Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Is Indiana Jones bad for archaeology?

Results so far:

Yes
19% 113 votes Total: 588 votes
No
81% 475 votes

by Amanda Demers

No, Indiana Jones is not bad for archeology. In fact, I'm sure that a lot of people with an active interest in archeology and related anthropology fields were at least partially influenced by this series. While the Indiana Jones movies represent a Hollywood version of archeology that's more full of adventure than real life, they make archeology "cool".

Speaking for myself, I can actually remember wanting to be an archaeologist as a young kid. It was always trying to find something to dig up or searching woods and beaches nearby for interesting finds. While I never found anything that dramatic, the search in and of itself was much fun.

In fact, I can largely attribute my early interest in archeology to watching the Indiana Jones movies. A popular movie series can definitely make science look more fun than reading about it out of a book typically can.

While movies can paint a somewhat inaccurate view of what archeology is really about, they can definitely help to bring out into the mainstream. After all, how many average people would give much thought to the Ark of the Covenant if there hadn't been a movie made about finding it?

Also worth noting is that the subjects of the first three Indiana Jones movies and the coming fourth one are based on real artifacts or well-known legends. Seeing a movie about any of these things will arouse most peoples' curiosity.

The Ark of the Covenant, written about extensively in the Book of Exodus and mentioned throughout the Hebrew Scriptures, is one of the biggest historical mysteries there is. This was the subject of "Raiders of the Lost Ark" Often thought to have disappeared when the Babylonians destroyed Solomon's Temple, its current location is still unknown. Theories range from being buried deep under Jerusalem to being located in Ethiopia (commonly believed to be where the Queen of Sheba hailed from).

While the Kali-worship featured in "Temple of Doom" is fictitious, there are cults known in history that have taken part in terrifying rituals that bring this movie to mind. One such group, the Chavin of South America, were featured on a "Digging for the Truth" episode titled "The Real Temple of Doom" (http://www.tv.com/digging-for -the-truth/the-real-temple-of- doom/episode/630444/summary.ht ml). The Chavin were known for using hallucinogenics as part of their rituals, possibly leading to mass mind control.

The "Holy Grail" (subject of The Last Crusade) has been the subject of hotly-debated legends. While there is no Biblical evidence that the chalice used at the Last Supper was venerated by early Christians, many legends have sprung up inspired by it. The Grail legend is prominent among some Celtic Christians.

The crystal skulls, featured in "The Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls", are also part of debated legends. Scientists are unsure of whether they're ancient Mayan artifacts or actually more recently created. In either case, they're an interesting group of artifacts to study.

While fictionalized, the Indiana Jones movies do make archeology more popular and generate interest in some of archeology's most fascinating mysteries.

Monday, July 5, 2010

Archeology, what is it?



“We do not follow maps to buried treasure and X never, ever marks the spot.”

Once again we can thank Dr. Jones for that very clever and precise, explanation. Archeology is not an exact science and even though movies and literature have made it seem as simple as following a map. Let me assure they’ve got it wrong.

The proper definition, from our friends in wikipedia, goes something like this:
Archaeology, or archeology (from Greek ἀρχαιολογία, archaiologia – ἀρχαῖος, arkhaīos, "ancient"; and -λογία, -logiā, "-logy"), is the study of past human societies, primarily through the recovery and analysis of the material culture and environmental data which they have left behind, which includes artifacts, architecture, biofacts and cultural landscapes.

And yes they have it pretty much figured out but I know the feeling, definitions like that make it sound boring and old. However there’s much more than meets the eyes.

Archeology is an art. It’s the way that present societies imagine and create worlds long gone. History is our canvas and anthropology, sociology and physiology are our brushes and colors.



Every archeologist has to write a Genesis every time they find a piece. The beginning has to be put down presenting they glorious creation of such piece. Why, what, how, when, where are few of the questions to write the interpretation. Once the Genesis is completed the archeologist is faced with the tough decision to destroy what he so beautifully has crafted. Apocalypse rains down on the creation and the archeologist has to explain or imagine why that piece was destroyed and ended.

It’s also the struggle of humans trying to figure out their past. Every time a piece is found the essence of the time and place lives once again. The glory and splendor are brought back to life, even though it’s only in that archeologist’s mind.

Archeology is my way of figuring out who I am and who we, as a collective community, are. It’s my way of explaining everything present and future.

Because to know our past is a way to find hope for our future.